Jurisdiction:
Area of Law:
Question:
Selected Answer:
Submitted by DakotaLegal on
All Comments
Submitted by DakotaLegal on
The problem is: anyone can be sued, in a civil court, for any act. And in the last twenty years, almost every state has passed some new laws, aimed squarely at making parents liable in some way for their kids’ actions. Tennessee, however, has only limited areas of liability under state law for parents: §T.C.A §§ 37-10-101 and 37-10-103 24, are laws essentially for children’s vandalism. It’s the purpose of the alleged vandalism you have to worry about, and here’s the full law: http://www.state.tn. us/tccy/tnchild/37/37-10-103.htm. The law applies to a minor (age 18 or under) and can allow for recovery of up to a maximum of $10,000 in damages.
Besides a suit under this statue, it’s possible for you to be sued at what’s called the Common Law. A jury might hold a parent responsible, if they could be convinced you knew of the special risks posed by your son, and failed to adequately “warn” or control those acts by your son. But to actually hold you financially liable here, there is a common element the neighbors would probably have a hard time proving….that the facts show that what your son did was ‘willful’ and malicious. He lit a bookmark, and not the rug. Willfulness seems to be a stretch in this case. On the other hand, this “willfulness” seems to be what they are suggesting by saying your son “showed no remorse.” It’s a stretch on their part. If they tried to sue under the common law, then they have the problem of showing their own actions (failing in adequate supervision of a child they know to have ADHD: where did the lighter come from? Has the son ever played with burning objects before?) did not somehow contribute to the damages.
You asked about holding the sitter responsible, but there are several problems with that, too. First, your legal interests and liability seem to be almost the same thing as the sitters. If the sitter is liable, then so are you. Even if she were a professionally licensed day care provider, you might be required to reimburse her (assuming there was nay legal liability). This is because most professionals have some fine print in their contracts for care, where any negligent act by a child must be reimbursed. Now, note that the word “negligent” in a contract is lot more liability than the idea of being ‘willful’ and malicious in a legal action.
Your son has some important legal rights and protections based on his disability. Many times these protections are going to depend on getting the correct diagnosis of ADHD. As you know, there’s more than one “type” of ADHD: and if you are a one-parent family, with its own special pressures, and money is an issue, there are treatment implications for this present problem. http://www. drgrantmartin.com/documents/ADHD-singlept-final.pdf.The laws designed to help kids with a disability are not, as some critics say, meant to give your son (or you) any special protections under the law. It is an attempt by the law to be sure your son is essentially given more equal footing. Disability laws help keep your son from being unfairly blamed or taken advantage of. A great place to start is with Tennessee’s “Protection and Advocacy” (or P&A) agency. Working with a P&A can also help address your concerns about where to send your child for child care, so that he gets the right kind of after-school care, too. The P&A will also help him get the right medical treatments if he needs them too. And in terms of liability, they can help there, too. Here’s the contact information for Tennessee’s P&A: http://www.dlactn.org/. Toll free, 1.800. 342.1660.
The problem is: anyone can be sued, in a civil court, for any act. And in the last twenty years, almost every state has passed some new laws, aimed squarely at making parents liable in some way for their kids’ actions. Tennessee, however, has only limited areas of liability under state law for parents: §T.C.A §§ 37-10-101 and 37-10-103 24, are laws essentially for children’s vandalism. It’s the purpose of the alleged vandalism you have to worry about, and here’s the full law: http://www.state.tn. us/tccy/tnchild/37/37-10-103.htm. The law applies to a minor (age 18 or under) and can allow for recovery of up to a maximum of $10,000 in damages.
Besides a suit under this statue, it’s possible for you to be sued at what’s called the Common Law. A jury might hold a parent responsible, if they could be convinced you knew of the special risks posed by your son, and failed to adequately “warn” or control those acts by your son. But to actually hold you financially liable here, there is a common element the neighbors would probably have a hard time proving….that the facts show that what your son did was ‘willful’ and malicious. He lit a bookmark, and not the rug. Willfulness seems to be a stretch in this case. On the other hand, this “willfulness” seems to be what they are suggesting by saying your son “showed no remorse.” It’s a stretch on their part. If they tried to sue under the common law, then they have the problem of showing their own actions (failing in adequate supervision of a child they know to have ADHD: where did the lighter come from? Has the son ever played with burning objects before?) did not somehow contribute to the damages.
You asked about holding the sitter responsible, but there are several problems with that, too. First, your legal interests and liability seem to be almost the same thing as the sitters. If the sitter is liable, then so are you. Even if she were a professionally licensed day care provider, you might be required to reimburse her (assuming there was nay legal liability). This is because most professionals have some fine print in their contracts for care, where any negligent act by a child must be reimbursed. Now, note that the word “negligent” in a contract is lot more liability than the idea of being ‘willful’ and malicious in a legal action.
Your son has some important legal rights and protections based on his disability. Many times these protections are going to depend on getting the correct diagnosis of ADHD. As you know, there’s more than one “type” of ADHD: and if you are a one-parent family, with its own special pressures, and money is an issue, there are treatment implications for this present problem. http://www. drgrantmartin.com/documents/ADHD-singlept-final.pdf.The laws designed to help kids with a disability are not, as some critics say, meant to give your son (or you) any special protections under the law. It is an attempt by the law to be sure your son is essentially given more equal footing. Disability laws help keep your son from being unfairly blamed or taken advantage of. A great place to start is with Tennessee’s “Protection and Advocacy” (or P&A) agency. Working with a P&A can also help address your concerns about where to send your child for child care, so that he gets the right kind of after-school care, too. The P&A will also help him get the right medical treatments if he needs them too. And in terms of liability, they can help there, too. Here’s the contact information for Tennessee’s P&A: http://www.dlactn.org/. Toll free, 1.800. 342.1660.